Stock exchanges vs decentralized exchanges: Same goal, different DNA

Stock exchanges and decentralized exchanges both match buyers and sellers, but the mechanics, governance, and risks are worlds apart.

Stock exchanges and decentralized exchanges (DEXes) serve the same purpose — but the DNA they operate on is radically different.

Understanding the difference reveals how power, risk, and opportunity can change based on a different underlying market mechanism or infrastructure.

How stock exchanges work: trust by centralization

Traditional exchanges are controlled ecosystems.

Access is gated. You can’t stroll onto the New York Stock Exchange floor and start trading. Instead, trading happens through registered broker-dealers acting on behalf of clients. Settlement — the actual ownership transfer — lags behind trades, often taking up to two days. In a world that moves at light speed, settlement remains old-fashion and slow.

Regulation blankets every layer: the SEC, FINRA, and state-level oversight form complex constraints on what's possible. Exchanges generate revenue by listing fees, trading fees, and selling data — including order book information — often to high-frequency traders operating in semi-private "dark pools." Another way to look at this is that visibility exists, but so does opacity, which is actually a product of the market

How decentralized exchanges work: trust by code

DEXes turn the traditional stock exchange model inside out. They aren't corporations, they’re open-source protocols. They live on public blockchains like Ethereum.

There are no broker dealers on DEXes. Literally anyone can show up and start trading. All you need is a compatible wallet. Trades settle onchain in seconds. Custody stays with the user — you hold your assets until you decide to swap them, eliminating third-party risk but introducing new risks, like smart contract exploits or phishing attacks.

Revenue models flip too: fees typically flow to liquidity providers, not a corporate treasury. Uniswap, the archetype DEX, pioneered the constant product market maker (CPMM) model, enabling fluid, permissionless liquidity without human intermediaries.

Of course, DEXes have no customer support hotlines. If you lose your keys or send tokens to a wrong address, there’s no undo button — only the blockchain's brutal finality.

The deeper differences: governance, transparency, fragility

Traditional exchanges answer to boards, shareholders, and regulators. DEXes can be governed by token holders through decentralized autonomous organizations or DAOs — a new kind of shareholder democracy, often messier, but radically more inclusive.

Transparency flips too. Nasdaq’s backroom order routing is opaque. A DEX’s transactions are public, auditable, and viewable by anyone on a public blockchain explorer.

Barriers to entry are orders of magnitutde lower on DEXes. Listing on NYSE requires months and is really expensive because of all of the regulations involved. Listing a token on a DEX can be done in an afternoon — for better or worse, given the proliferation of scams and worthless assets.

The risk profile for each are very different. Stock exchanges are too-big-to-fail institutions, stitched into the global economy. DEXes are modular, antifragile in theory, but vulnerable to liquidity splinters and code vulnerabilities.

Why it matters now

Institutions are edging into crypto — but they're cozying up to centralized exchanges and service providers, generally not DEXes.

Meanwhile, it's hard to integrate DEXes with traditional financial regulations, or fit old laws to new architectures.

Today's "exchange wars" — centralized versus decentralized — echo the shift from chaotic trading pits to electronic markets. The question isn't whether finance will digitize. It's whether it will decentralize — and what will change along way.

Stock exchanges promise stability, familiarity, and rule of law — but at the cost of opacity and exclusion.

DEXes offer radical transparency, sovereignty, and speed — but require users to bear risks once managed by institutions.

The future likely won't be binary. Hybrid models may emerge: centralized custody fused with decentralized settlement while tokenized stocks trade on permissionless networks.

Recent Open Money posts

This post is part of the Open Money Project, an ongoing series that forms the basis of a longer work. Subscribe to get a weekly update as it unfolds.